Comparing fMRI inter-subject correlations between groups using ISC-toolbox

Stand-By Time

Tuesday, June 27, 2017: 12:45 PM  - 2:45 PM 

Submission No:

1691 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

On Display:

Monday, June 26 & Tuesday, June 27 

Authors:

Jussi Tohka1, Frank Pollick2, Juha Pajula3, Jukka-Pekka Kauppi4

Institutions:

1University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, 2University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 3VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tampere, Finland, 4University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland

First Author:

Jussi Tohka    -  Lecture Information | Contact Me
University of Eastern Finland
Kuopio, Finland

Introduction:

In the inter-subject correlation (ISC) based analysis of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, the extent of shared processing across subjects during the experiment is determined by calculating correlation coefficients between the fMRI time series of the subjects in the corresponding brain locations. This implies that ISC can be used to analyze fMRI data without explicitly modeling the stimulus and thus ISC is a potential method to analyze fMRI data acquired under complex naturalistic stimuli. The freely available ISC toolbox (Kauppi 2014) provides a GUI-driven software framework to carry out various ISC based analysis such as mean, frequency band, time window and phase synchronization ISC analysis. We have extended the functionality of the ISC-Toolbox to analyze the differences of ISCs between two distinct groups of subjects. This abstract presents these novel features of the ISC-Toolbox as well as validation results concerning this new type of ISC analysis.

Methods:

We rely largely on the methodology put forth by Chen 2016 with few important differences and additions. For every voxel, the test statistic is the difference between the average z-transformed subject-pair wise ISC values between the two groups. The hypothesis test utilized is a permutation test containing multiple comparisons correction. We implement three different types of permutations: 1) element-wise, where the subject-pairs (elements of correlation matrix) are permuted between the groups, 2) subject-wise, where the subjects are permuted between the two groups, and 3) optimized subject-wise permutations, where the subjects are permuted, but between group correlations that arise are ignored. Our experiments with synthetic data confirmed the findings by Chen 2016 that the element-wise permutations lead to too liberal hypothesis tests while the subject-wise permutations maintain the correct alpha level. Novel optimized subject-wise permutations are introduced due to the heavy memory burden of the subject-wise permutations and theoretically reduce the memory consumption to one third of the subject-wise permutation test.

Results:

We evaluated the method by using fMRIs from 36 healthy young adults during the auditory naming task of the ICBM functional reference battery, see (Pajula 2012) for the details of the data and its processing . We divided 36 subjects randomly into two groups of 18 subjects. We expected to see no difference between similar groups. The element-wise permutation was too lenient, indicating 240 voxels of the significant ISC difference . Two other permutation types correctly identified no significant difference (p < 0.05, voxel-wise FWER corrected over the whole brain in all cases).

Additionally, we have applied the method to compare inter-subject synchronisation of 12 male adults on the autism spectrum to 10 age and IQ matched typically developed male adults while they viewed a 90 second clip of a solo ballet dance. We found significant ISC differences (p < 0.05 voxel wise FWER-corrected using permutation test) involving greater synchronisation for the autism group in the Middle Temporal Gyrus, BA 37, at Talairach coordinates (-49, -62, 4).

Conclusions:

We have introduced the implementation of between-group ISC analysis incorporated to ISC-Toolbox and validated the analysis. The ISC-Toolbox with these novel features is available at https://www.nitrc.org/projects/isc-toolbox/ .

Imaging Methods:

BOLD fMRI

Informatics:

Informatics Other 1

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Methods Development
Task-Independent and Resting-State Analysis 2

Poster Session:

Poster Session - Tuesday

Keywords:

Informatics
Statistical Methods

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Would you accept an oral presentation if your abstract is selected for an oral session?

Yes

I would be willing to discuss my abstract with members of the press should my abstract be marked newsworthy:

Yes

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Task-activation

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute the presentation in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels or other electronic media and on the OHBM website.

I accept

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Patients

Internal Review Board (IRB) or Animal Use and Care Committee (AUCC) Approval. Please indicate approval below. Please note: Failure to have IRB or AUCC approval, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.

Yes, I have IRB or AUCC approval

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

3.0T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

FSL
Other, Please list  -   ISC-Toolbox

Provide references in author date format

G. Chen, Y-W Shin, P A. Taylor, D R. Glen, R C. Reynolds, R B. Israel, R W. Cox, Untangling the relatedness among correlations, part I: Nonparametric approaches to inter-subject correlation analysis at the group level, NeuroImage, 142, 248 - 259 2016.

J.-P. Kauppi, J. Pajula and J. Tohka . A Versatile Software Package for Inter-subject Correlation Based Analyses of fMRI. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8:2, 2014.

J. Pajula, J.-P. Kauppi, and J. Tohka . Inter-Subject Correlation in fMRI: Method Validation against Stimulus-model Based Analysis, PLoS ONE, 7(8):e41196 2012.